Tuesday, October 30, 2012
An Update on My "Secrets Stolen/Fortunes Lost" Co-Author Christopher Burgess
In case you missed it, my Secrets Stolen, Fortunes Lost co-author, Christopher Burgess was featured in a recent Forbes Magazine article on What Do Former CIA Spies Do When They Quit the Spy Game?
Upon retirement after thirty years with the Central Intelligence Agency, in various position including Station Chief, Burgess, was awarded the Career Distinguished Intelligence Medal, the highest level of career recognition. After retirement, he took on important roles in the private sector, first as Senior Advisor to Cisco Chief Security Office (CSO) John Stewart, and then as CSO himself at Atigeo. In the Forbes piece, Christopher shares some insights on his transition:
One [skill] that served me well was my ability to collaborate. That’s a huge skill for a field officer. Everybody on a team has something to contribute and you have to truly recognize and believe that. Another skill is a technique common to planning intelligence operations: building in ‘fall back positions’ and alternate routes while mapping out how to attain a goal. In Agency operations, things go wrong and you have to have backup plans. Also in the corporate world, whether you are selling a widget or consulting, competitors will surprise you. Dealing with that surprise, keeping your cool when all about you are losing theirs, definitely came from Agency training. Another key skill I developed in the Agency was creating loyal workforces, which yield outstanding results. A big part of that is knowing exactly what you are asking someone to do. If you don’t know from personal experience, you cannot be shy about asking them to give you feedback on their probability of success in a risky operation. Art Keller, What Do Former CIA Spies Do When They Quit the Spy Game? Forbes, 10-12-12
As I have mentioned in previous posts, this year, in CSO Magazine, I have been focusing on interviews with C-level executives, who also happened to be thought-leaders. (Surely, you have noticed that "C-level executives" and "thought leaders" are not straightforward synonyms?)
In the first of these interviews (fourth one coming soon), Christopher and I discussed a range of vital issues, but of course we started with a look back at our collaboration on Secrets Stolen/Fortunes Lost:
My 30,000-foot perspective has not changed since we co-authored Secrets Stolen, Fortune Lost — every company (emphasis intended) regardless of locale has the potential to fall into the sights of an entity or individual who has designs on their assets. The company can choose to educate or not educate their workforce to this reality. Sadly, I continue to see far too many companies operating as if they are immune from falling into the cross-hairs of someone's targeting scheme because they aren't engaged in national security work — they equate economic espionage and IP theft to only those in the national security vertical. While I don t disagree the nation state vector is one about which we, collectively, must pay attention; the individual, the competitor and the criminal vectors also warrant every company's attention. How to meet the challenges of 21st century security and privacy, CSO Magazine, 4-18-12
NOTE: You can find links to all my CSO Magazine articles in the CyBlog sidebar.
Christopher Burgess is also one of those experts from business and government (in this instance, it's a twofer!) who have delivered CyLab Seminars in the context of my Business Risks Forum. He has given two Seminars, one in 2010 and one this year.
Access to the webcast and online archive of the CyLab Seminar series is an exclusive benefit available only to CyLab Partners. But from time to time, we release select seminars, and excerpts from seminars, via You Tube and iTunes to both promote our program and contribute to the public dialogue on the vital issues of cyber security and privacy.
Here are embedded videos of both of Burgess' CyLab Seminars. Enjoy.
CyLab Business Risks Forum: Christopher Burgess - Collaborative Distributed Inferencing (2012)
CyLab Business Risks Forum: Christoper Burgess - Common Sense Approach to Social Media (2010)
Monday, October 29, 2012
CyLab Researchers Discuss Code 2600, Award-Winning Cyber Crime Documentary with Filmaker Jeremy Zerechak
CyLab Researchers Discuss Code 2600, Award-Winning Cyber Crime Documentary
with Filmaker Jeremy Zerechak
Carnegie Mellon University CyLab recently hosted two screenings of CODE 2600, an award-winning full-length documentary on the societal implications of cyber security and cyber risk.
These evening screenings were preceded by a special CyLab Seminar Series event: a panel discussion in which
three CyLab researchers, Lorrie Cranor, Nicolas Christin and Norman Sadeh, joined filmmaker Jeremy Zerechak
for a discussion of the film and the important issues it highlights.
three CyLab researchers, Lorrie Cranor, Nicolas Christin and Norman Sadeh, joined filmmaker Jeremy Zerechak
for a discussion of the film and the important issues it highlights.
Dr. Cranor, who moderated the panel, was among numerous cyber security and privacy experts interviewed in the documentary, others included: world-class cryptographer and security commentator Bruce Schneier,
BlackHat and DEFCON founder Jeff Moss, leading security iconoclast Marcus Ranum and Jennifer Granick,
Here is the full video of the panel discussion, beginning with a clip from the film:
For more compelling videos on cybersecurity and privacy, visit the CyLab You Tube Channel and
CyLab iTunes Store. The content is free!
Labels:
Code 2600,
Cyber Security,
Cyberwar,
CyBlog,
CyLab,
Lorrie Cranor,
Nicholas Christin,
Norman Sadeh
Thursday, October 18, 2012
Sample Some Fruits of CyLab Mobility Research Safeslinger for Secure Smartphone Communications. It's FREE!
Sample Some Fruits of CyLab Mobility Research, e.g., Safeslinger for Mobile App for Secure Smartphone Communications. It's FREE!
By Richard Power
CyLab has seven major research thrusts (as seven cross-cutting research thrusts); Mobility is one of those seven major research thrusts. And CyLab research isn't locked away in some ivory tower of abstraction; no, it is impacting security in the here and now.
Safeslinger, developed by Mike Farb, Adrian Perrig, Jonathan McCune and other CyLab team members is an excellent example.
This video, available via the CyLab You Tube Channel illustrates the how and why.
More on Safeslinger from CyLab Online
CyLab Chronicles: Mike Farb Offers Insights Into SafeSlinger, CyLab's Powerful New Smartphone App
CyLab's New Smartphone App, SafeSlinger, Empowers Users' to Strengthen Their Own Security and Privacy
SafeSlinger App for Mobile Devices
SafeSlinger: An Easy-to-use and Secure Approach for Human Trust Establishment
CyLab Chronicles: Q&A with Mike Farb (2011)
CyLab Researchers Release KeySlinger, Security App for iPhone and Android
Labels:
Cyber Security,
Mobile App,
Mobility,
Safeslinger,
Smartphone
Tuesday, September 25, 2012
BSIMM4 Released; If You Are Not Part of the Solution, Well Then ...
BSIMM4 Released; If You Are Not Part of the Solution, Well then ...
By Richard Power
My perspective on cyber security goes back to the mid-1990s, and well, yes, my view on its current state (and its likely future) is rather cynical. Why? I was among those who spent the 1990s warning of what was to come, and having those warnings discounted by those entranced by that mass of false memes known as "the conventional wisdom." For the next ten years, I watched the nascent trends I had detected become dominant themes in the field. And in recent years, since the retrospective I offered in 2006, it has become chillingly clear to me that neither sufficient political will nor sufficient corporate accountablility exist to address these problems in any meaningful way.
What I do have sustained confidence in, of course, is academic research, particularly that done here at CyLab, such work is one of our greatest hopes, and that is why I am so happy to a part of such a program.
The only other element of contemporary cyber security that I have sustained confidence in is the work of those few in business and government who have made the existential choice to see and respond to what actually is, and do so in some way that can make a real difference in and of itself.
That's why my CSO articles this year (see them listed on the sidebar) are all interviews with c-level security and privacy executives who are also thought leaders (surely, you have noticed that these two descriptors are not synonyms). It is also why I take the time, annually, to report to you on the release of the latest BSIMM.
Am I inferring that BSIMM is THE solution? Of course not. There is no ONE solution. But it is an exemplary effort to mitigate and to collective coalesce around mitigating efforts, and as such it is worthy of both your attention and possibly your involvement.
BSIMM4 encompasses ten times the measurement data of the original 2009 study (95 distinct measurements), it includes updated activity descriptions, and reports on two new activities (bringing the activity count going forward to 111); and (like BSIMM3), it also includes a longitudinal study.
The project continues to grow is a steady and meaningful way.
The first release of BSIMM, in 2009, included data from nine organizations. By the next release, BSIMM2, in 2010, participation had tripled to thirty organizations.
In 2011, the number of organizations contributing data continued to grow, forty-five organizations were involved in BSIMM3.
This year's iteration, BSIMM4, is built on data from fifty-one firms; and these participants represent a range of twelve overlapping verticals including: financial services (19) independent software vendors (19), technology firms (13), cloud (13), media (4), security (3), telecommunications (3), insurance (2), energy (2), retail (2) and healthcare (1).
The list of organizations contributing data is impressive, e.g., Adobe, Aon, Bank of America, Box, Capital One, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), EMC, F‐Secure, Fannie Mae, Fidelity, Google, Intel, Intuit, JPMorgan Chase & Co., Mashery, McKesson, Microsoft, Nokia, Nokia Siemens Networks, QUALCOMM, Rackspace, Salesforce, Sallie Mae, SAP, Scripps Network, Sony Mobile, Standard Life, SWIFT, Symantec, Telecom Italia, Thomson Reuters, Vanguard, Visa, VMware, Wells Fargo and Zynga.
"A Huge Difference"
To provide some insight on this year's BSIMM release, I caught up with with its architect, Cigital CTO Gary McGraw, and asked him some questions.
What strikes you in this year's data? Or in the cumulative data so far? What stands out as surprising or deserving of added emphasis?
"The BSIMM continues to grow and evolve as we gather more data. We now have 10 times as many measurements as we started with in 2009. Basically, the data show that if you are not doing software security today you are rapidly falling behind. As an example of what this means, consider that two brand new activities were identified in the BSIMM4 model. The field is growing and progressing."
How would you characterize the impact of BSIMM so far? How would you gauge it? What difference is it making? What difference could it potentially make?
"The BSIMM is making a huge difference in software security as practiced in the commercial marketplace. With 51 firms actively participating, the BSIMM has become a large community of like minded professionals. The power of the community is evident during the (private) conferences that we hold once a year. The professionals who run software security initiatives are eager to share what they know and learn from each other."
Download BSIMM4. Review it with your team, bring it to your Board of Directors. Participant in the next iteration. Become part of the solution, or at least an example of what one dimension of the solution would look like.
For more information and to access the BSIMM4 study, which is distributed free of charge under a Creative Commons license, please visit: http://bsimm.com/
Related Posts
BSIMM3 Released: "An Excellent Tool for Devising a Software Security Strategy"
Evolving Rapidly, BSIMM2 Offers Key Elements of Successful Software Security Initiatives Shared by 30 Major Corporations
From Biometrics to BSIMM , & "50 Hurricanes Hitting At Once!" -- A Report on the Sixth Annual Partners Conference
CyLab Business Risks Forum: Gary McGraw on Online Games, Electronic Voting and Software Security
Fortify & Cigital Release BSIMM -- Integrating Best Practices from Nine Software Security Initiatives
Monday, July 16, 2012
CyLab's SOUPS Continues Its Ongoing, Deepening Dialogue on What Works and What Doesn't
CyLab's SOUPS Continues Its Ongoing, Deepening Dialogue on What Works and What Doesn't
Last week in Washington, D.C., the important work of the Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security (SOUPS), now in its eighth year, continued to deepen and expand. The annual event, shaped and led by Dr. Lorrie Cranor, Director of CyLab Usable Privacy and Security (CUPS) Lab, generates rich content with which to better inform the development of programs, policies and applications.
SOUPS' technical paper sessions were organized into five categories:
Mobile Privacy and Security
User Perceptions
Authentication
Online Social Networks
Access Control
Here are excerpts from select papers in each of these categories, along with links to the full texts:
Mobile Privacy and Security
Adrienne Porter Felt, Elizabeth Ha, Serge Egelman, Ariel Haney, Erika Chin, David Wagner, Android Permissions: User Attention, Comprehension, and Behavior, UC Berkeley:
We performed two usability studies to address the attention, comprehension, and behavior questions ... Our primary findings are: Attention. In both the Internet survey and laboratory study, 17% of participants paid attention to permissions during a given installation. At the same time, 42% of laboratory participants were unaware of the existence of permissions. Comprehension. Overall, participants demonstrated very low rates of comprehension. Only 3% of Internet survey respondents could correctly answer three comprehension questions. However, 24% of laboratory study participants demonstrated competent—albeit imperfect—comprehension. Behavior. A majority of Internet survey respondents claimed to have decided not to install an application because of its permissions at least once. Twenty percent of our laboratory study participants were able to provide concrete details about times that permissions caused them to cancel installation. Our findings indicate that the Android permission system is neither a total success nor a complete failure.
User Perceptions
Blase Ur, Pedro Giovanni Leon, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Richard Shay, Yang Wang, Smart, Useful, Scary, Creepy: Perceptions of Online Behavioral Advertising, Carnegie Mellon University:
Participants found behavioral advertising both useful and privacyinvasive. The majority of participants were either fully or partially opposed to OBA, finding the idea smart but creepy. However, this attitude seemed to be influenced in part by beliefs that more data is collected than actually is. Participants understood neither the roles of different companies involved in OBA, nor the technologies used to profile users, contributing to their misunderstandings. Given effective notice about the practice of tailoring ads based on users’ browsing activities, participants wouldn’t need to understand the underlying technologies and business models. However, current notice and choice mechanisms are ineffective. Furthermore, current mechanisms focus on opting out of targeting by particular companies, yet participants displayed faulty reasoning in evaluating companies. In contrast, participants displayed complex preferences about the situations in which their browsing data could be collected, yet they currently cannot exercise these preferences.
Authentication
Richard Shay, Patrick Gage Kelley, Saranga Komanduri, Michelle L. Mazurek, Blase Ur, Timothy Vidas, Lujo Bauer, Nicolas Christin, Lorrie Faith Cranor, Correct horse battery staple: Exploring the usability of system-assigned passphrases, Carnegie Mellon University:
Our findings suggest that system-assigned passphrases are far from a panacea for user authentication. Rather than committing them to memory, users tend to write down or otherwise store both passwords and passphrases when they are system assigned. When compared to our password conditions, no passphrase condition significantly outperformed passwords in any of our usability metrics, indicating that the system assigned passphrase types we tested fail to offer substantial usability benefits over system-assigned passwords of equivalent strength. We even find that system-assigned passphrases might actually be less usable than system-assigned passwords. For instance, users were able to enter their passwords more quickly and with fewer errors than passphrases of similar strength. While our results in general do not strongly favor system-assigned passwords over system-assigned passphrases or vice versa, we identify several areas for further investigation. For example, larger dictionary sizes do not appear to have a substantial impact on usability for passphrases. This could be leveraged to make stronger passphrases without much usability cost. We also find that lowercase, pronounceable passwords are an unexpectedly promising strategy for generating system-assigned passwords.
Online Social Networks
Thomas Muders, Matthew Smith and Uwe Sander, Helping Johnny 2.0 to Encrypt His Facebook Conversations, Leibniz Universitaet and University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hannover, Germany:
While there are some solutions available to cryptographically protect Facebook conversations, to the best of the authors' knowledge, there is no widespread use of them. Thus, the aim of our work was to nd out why this might be the case and what could be done to help OSN users to encrypt their Facebook conversations. While mechanisms to protect email messaging could in principle be adapted to Facebook conversations in a straightforward manner, previous usability studies show signi cant problems with the existing email encryption mechanisms. One of our goals was therefore to see if the changes brought about by the OSN paradigm might open up new possibilities for a usable security mechanism protecting private OSN messages. To answer these questions, we conducted multiple studies to evaluate needs surrounding the protection of users' conversations on Facebook and then compared different existing solutions for conversation encryption. Based on these intermediate results, we developed an approach to encrypt Facebook conversations which we tested in two user studies to ascertain whether the solution provided good usability characteristics while at the same time protecting user privacy. The results of the final study show that the OSN paradigm does indeed o er new ways of simplifying security and fi nding security/usability trade-o s which are acceptable to users.
Access Control
Jason Watson, Andrew Besmer, Heather Richter Lipford, +Your Circles - Sharing Behavior on Google+, University of North Carolina (Charlotte):
This study o ers insight into the behavior of Google+ users and how they use group based sharing. We found participants had strong positive attitudes towards using circles and generally understood the intended purpose of them. However, much of the use of circles was not to protect disclosures from certain people, but to increase the relevance of posting to people. Thus, users are still treating information they post as relatively public. While this may decrease the liklihood of accidentally oversharing, this also means that users will continue to experience the issues from self-censoring, such as the inability to more deeply connect to close friends. Also, despite user understanding, we still saw a disconnect in users' stated desires and behavior. While Google+ lowered the level of eff ort required to interact in contextually appropriate ways, many continued using strategies for privacy management they had formed by using Facebook and simply posted to all circles. In addition, some participants found that circle use increased the mental demand required for social network interaction. Similar to previous studies, the increased e ort lead some of our participants to bypass the privacy mechanisms. In the case of this study, this meant collapsing friends into a single circle. Thus, Google+ users are not yet taking full advantage of the capabilities provided by circles for greater control over information flow. However, these results are also heavily influenced by the overall lack of people and activity on the site, which may have reduced the need for the use of circles. Yet, if site usage grows and users add more connections, the burden of managing circles is also likely to grow.
For the full agenda and links to all the papers presented, visit SOUPS 2012.
For more information on CyLab's ongoing research into Usable Privacy and Security, visit CUPS.
See Also
SOUPS 2011 Advances Vital Exploration of Usability and Its Role in Strengthening Privacy and Security
SOUPS 2010: Insight into Usable Privacy & Security Deepens at 6th Annual Symposium
Reflections on SOUPS 2009: Between Worlds, Cultivating Superior Cleverness, Awaiting a Shift in Consciousness
Glimpses into the Fourth Annual Symposium on Usable Security and Privacy (SOUPS 2008)
For information on other aspects of CyLab's vital work, visit
http://www.cylab.cmu.edu/
Saturday, May 26, 2012
CyLab Chronicles: CyLab's Strong Presence at IEEE Security and Privacy 2012 Packs A Wallop
CyLab's Zongwei Zhou talks on Building Verifiable Trusted Path on Commodity X86 Computers
CyLab Chronicles: CyLab's Strong Presence at IEEE Security and Privacy 2012 Packs A Wallop
The 33rd annual IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy held at the St. Francis hotel in downtown San Francisco (May 20-May 23, 2012), is one of the respected venues in the field, and once again, numerous papers presented by Carnegie Mellon University CyLab researcher and several sessions chaired by CyLab faculty made for a powerful presence.
Seven papers authored or co-authored by CyLab researchers were presented in the course of the three-day program. In addition to the papers presented, CyLab faculty also chaired three sessions.
Here is the CyLab 2012 IEEE Security and Privacy roster of papers and presenters, with brief excerpts from each paper:
Jiyong Jang talked on ReDeBug: Finding Unpatched Code Clones in Entire OS Distributions, a paper co-authored with Abeer Agrawal, and CyLab faculty David Brumley.
"ReDeBug was designed for scalability to entire OS distributions, the ability to handle real code, and minimizing false detection. ReDeBug found 15,546 unpatched code clones, which likely represent real vulnerabilities, by analyzing 2.1 billion lines of code on a commodity desktop. We demonstrate the practical impact of ReDeBug by confirming 145 real bugs in the latest version of Debian Squeeze packages. We believe ReDeBug can be a realistic solution for regular developers to enhance the security of their code in day-to-day development."
Michael Carl Tschantz presented Formalizing and Enforcing Purpose Restrictions of Privacy Policies, a paper co-authored with Anupam Datta and Jeannette M. Wing.
"Our work makes the following contributions: 1) The first semantic formalism of when a sequence of actions is for a purpose; 2) Empirical validation that our formalism closely corresponds to how people understand the word “purpose”; 3) An algorithm employing our formalism and its implementation for auditing; and 4) The characterization of previous policy enforcement methods in our formalism and a comparative study of their expressiveness. The first two contributions illustrate that planning can formalize purpose restrictions. The next two illustrate that our formalism may aid automated auditing and analysis."
Xin Zhang, who graduated from Carnegie Mellon University and now works for Google, delivered Secure and Scalable Fault Localization under Dynamic Traffic Patterns, co-authored with CyLab Technical Director Adrian Perrig, and by Chang Lan of Tsinghua University.
"While existing path-based FL protocols aim to identify a specific faulty link (if any), DynaFL localizes data-plane faults to a coarser-grained 1-hop neighborhood, to achieve four distinct advantages. First, DynaFL does not require any minimum duration time of paths or flows in order to detect data-plane faults as path-based FL protocols do. Thus, DynaFL can fully cope with short-lived flows which are popularly seen in modern networks. Second, in DynaFL, a source node does not need to know the exact outgoing path, unlike path-based FL protocols. Hence, DynaFL can support agile (e.g., packet-level) load balancing such as VL2 routing [20] for datacenter networks. Third, a DynaFL router only needs around 4MB per-neighbor state based on our classic Sketch implementation, while a router in a path-based FL protocol requires per-path state. Finally, a DynaFL router only maintains a single secret key shared with the AC, while a router in a path-based FL protocol needs to manage 100 to 10000 secret keys in measured ISP topologies."
Sang Kil Cha spoke on Unleashing Mayhem on Binary Code, co-authored with Thanassis Avgerinos, Alexandre Rebert and David Brumley.
"We presented MAYHEM, a tool for automatically finding exploitable bugs in binary (i.e., executable) programs in an efficient and scalable way. To this end, MAYHEM introduces a novel hybrid symbolic execution scheme that combines the benefits of existing symbolic execution techniques (both online and offline) into a single system. We also present index-based memory modeling, a technique that allows MAYHEM to discover more exploitable bugs at the binary-level. We used MAYHEM to analyze 29 applications and automatically identified and demonstrated 29 exploitable vulnerabilities."
Saranga Komanduri talked on Guess again (and again and again): Measuring password strength by simulating password-cracking algorithms, co-authored with Patrick Gage Kelley, , Michelle L. Mazurek, Richard Shay, Tim Vidas, Lujo Bauer, Nicolas Christin, Lorrie Faith Cranor, and Julio Lopez.
"We introduced a new, efficient technique for evaluating password strength, which can be implemented for a variety of password-guessing algorithms and tuned using a variety of training sets to gain insight into the comparative guess resistance of different sets of passwords. Using this technique, we performed a more comprehensive password analysis than had previously been possible. We found several notable results about the comparative strength of different composition policies. Although NIST considers basic16 and comprehensive8 equivalent, we found that basic16 is superior against large numbers of guesses. Combined with a prior result that basic16 is also easier for users [46], this suggests basic16 is the better policy choice. We also found that the effectiveness of a dictionary check depends heavily on the choice of dictionary; in particular, a large blacklist created using state-of-the-art password-guessing techniques is much more effective than a standard dictionary at preventing users from choosing easily guessed passwords. Our results also reveal important information about conducting guess-resistance analysis ..."
Hsu-Chun Hsiao presented LAP: Lightweight Anonymity and Privacy, co-authored with Tiffany Hyun-Jin Kim, and Adrian Perrig, along with Akira Yamada (KDDI R&D), Sam Nelson and Marco Gruteser (Rutgers University), and Wei Ming (Tsinghua University).
"In this framework, our approach is simple yet effective: by leveraging encrypted packet-carried forwarding state, ISPs that support our protocol can efficiently forward packets towards the destination, where each encrypted ISP-hop further camouflages the source or destination address or its location. Although encrypted packet-carried forwarding state is currently not supported in IP, we design simple extensions to IP that could enable this technology. In particular, our approach is even more relevant in future network architectures, where the design can be readily incorporated. This new point in the design space of anonymity protocols could also be used in concert with other techniques, for example in conjunction with Tor to prevent one Tor node from learning its successor. Despite weaker security proper- ties than Tor, we suspect that LAP contributes a significant benefit towards providing topological anonymity, as LAP is practical to use for all communication.
Zongwei Zhou delivered Building Verifiable Trusted Path on Commodity X86 Computers, co-authored with CyLab Director Virgil Gligor, as well as James Newsome and Jonathan M. McCune.
"Building a general-purpose trusted path mechanism for commodity computers with a significant level of assurance requires substantial systems engineering, which has not been completely achieved by prior work. Specifically, it requires (1) effective countermeasures against I/O attacks enabled by inadequate I/O architectures and potentially compromised operating systems; and (2) small trusted codebases that can be integrated with commodity operating systems. The design presented in this paper shows that, in principle, trusted path can be achieved on commodity computers, and suggests that simple I/O architecture changes would simplify trusted-path design considerably."
-- Richard Power
See Also:
CyLab Research has Powerful Impact on 2010 IEEE Security and Privacy Symposium
Microcosm & Macrocosm: Reflections on 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy; Q and A on Cloud, Cyberwar and Internet Freedom with Dr. Peter Neumann
Five Papers Add to Impressive CyLab Presence at ACM CCS 2011
CyLab Research Presentations Impact CHI 2011
USENIX Security 2011: Another Ring on the Tree Trunk for One of Cyber Security's Worthiest Gatherings, and a Strong CyLab Presence
USENIX Security 2011: CyLab Researchers Release Study on Illicit Online Drug Trade and Attacks on Pharma Industry
A Report on 2012 IEEE Symposium on Privacy and Security
Hsu-Chun Hsiao delivers a paper on LAP: Lightweight Anonymity and Privacy
A Report on 2012 IEEE Symposium on Privacy and Security
As noted in previous CyBlog posts, IEEE's annual Symposium on Privacy and Security (a.k.a. "Oakland") is an important event in the realm of academic research on how to best strengthen cyber security and privacy. This year's Symposium lived up to expectations. (And I am not just saying that because Carnegie Mellon University CyLab's imprint was on eight different sessions. See CyLab Chronicles: CyLab's Strong Presence at IEEE Security and Privacy 2012 Packs A Wallop.)
Here are a few glimpses into some sessions that interested me.
Prudent Practices for Designing Malware Experiments
Christian Rossow of the Institute for Internet Security delivered a talk on "Prudent Practices for Designing Malware Experiments," a paper co-authored with Christian J. Dietrich and Norbert Pohlmann, also of Institute for Internet Security, along Chris Grier, Christian Kreibich and Vern Paxson of University of California, Berkeley and International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, as well as Herbert Bos and Maarten van Steen, VU University Amsterdam, The Network Institute.
Rossow articulated numerous guidelines on safety, transparency, realism and correct data sets.
I have pulled out an example of one of the guidelines from each categories:
Safety: "1) Deploy and describe containment policies. Well-designed containment policies facilitate realistic experiments while mitigating the potential harm malware causes to others over time. Experiments should at a minimum employ basic containment policies such as redirecting spam and infection attempts, and identifying and suppressing DoS attacks. Authors should discuss the containment policies and their implications on the fidelity of the experiments. Ideally, authors also monitor and discuss security breaches in their containment."
Transparency: "4) Mention the system used during execution. Malware may execute differently (if at all) across various systems, software configurations and versions. Explicit description of the particular system(s) used (e.g., 'Windows XP SP3 32bit without additional software installations') renders experiments more transparent, especially as presumptions about the 'standard' OS change with time. When relevant, authors should also include version information of installed software.
Realism: "5) Consider allowing Internet access to malware. Deferring legal and ethical considerations for a moment, we argue that experiments become significantly more realistic if the malware has Internet access. Malware often requires connectivity to communicate with command-and-control (C&C) servers and thus to expose its malicious behavior. In exceptional cases where experiments in simulated Internet environments are appropriate, authors need to describe the resulting limitations.
Correct data sets: "2) Balance datasets over malware families. In unbalanced datasets, aggressively polymorphic malware families will often unduly dominate datasets filtered by sample-uniqueness (e.g., MD5 hashes). Authors should discuss if such imbalances biased their experiments, and, if so, balance the datasets to the degree possible. explicitly if they decide to blend malicious traces with benign background activity."
Detecting Hoaxes, Frauds, and Deception in Writing Style Online
Sadia Afroz of Drexel University delivered a talk on "Detecting Hoaxes, Frauds, and Deception in Writing Style Online," a paper co-authored with colleagues Michael Brennan and Rachel Greenstadt.
This fascinating paper used the compelling story from recent headlines, i.e., strange tale of Amina, the "Gay Girl in Damascus," whose blog captured the attention of the world during the early days of the Arab Spring, only to be later revealed as the work of Thomas Macmaster, a 40 year old American male.
In reporting on the research, Afroz and her colleagues, concluded:
"Stylometry is necessary to determine authenticity of a document to prevent deception, hoaxes and frauds. In this work, we show that manual counter-measures against stylometry can be detected using second-order effects. That is, while it may be impossible to detect the author of a document whose authorship has been obfuscated, the obfuscation itself is detectable using a large feature set that is content-independent. Using Information Gain Ratio, we show that the most effective features for detecting deceptive writing are function words. We analyze a long-term deception and show that regular authorship recognition is more effective than deception detection to find indication of stylistic deception in this case."
As Afroz and her colleagues also point out, such research has implications for adversarial learning in general:
"Machine learning is often used in security problems from spam detection, to intrusion detection, to malware analysis. In these situations, the adversarial nature of the problem means that the adversary can often manipulate the classifier to produce lower quality or sometimes entirely ineffective results. In the case of adversarial writing, we show that using a broader feature set causes the manipulation itself to be detectable. This approach may be useful in other areas of adversarial learning to increase accuracy by screening out adversarial inputs."
Oakrams: Searching Through Strands of Oakland's DNA
The three day event culminated in a all-star panel on "How can a Focus on 'Science' Advance Research in Cyber Security?" Moderated by Carl Landwehr, the panel members, including Alessandro Acquisti (Carnegie Mellon), Dan Boneh (Stanford), Joshua Guttman (Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Wenke Lee (Georgia Tech) and Cormac Herley (Microsoft) on whether or not the realm of cyber security as currently constituted should be or is already "science." But honestly, in spite of some sparkling insights, particularly from Acquisti and Herley, this debate has a certain dog chasing its tail futility to it. It is the kind of debate that become central after it is already too late to grasp the reality of a situation. It reminded me of a sage perspective delivered back in the 1990s, by the legendary Donn B. Parker: "Information Security, A Folk Art in Need of An Upgrade." Parker was spot-on on that, as well as on other issues.
So before the theme music to the Bill Murray film Groundhog Day once again starts to rise up in my psyche, let me turn away from the august panel and its erudite dialogue, and end this report from Oakland on a "short talk" in which Hilarie Orman (Purple Streak, Inc.) shared her "Oakrams."
I suggest there is at least as much import in them as in the debate over "cyber security" as "science."
Orman was kind enough to explain her exercise to me.
"I call them 'Oakrams' (the conference used to be called "Oakland" informally, and the software is based on an open source system call 'WordCram.' I modified WordCram so that I could control the coloring based on the word position, and so that I could reuse a word placement while changing size and color. This resulted in two sequences of images. I preprocessed the text of the papers so that for each year I had an ordered list of all non-trivial words that occurred 20 times or more. In the first sequence, for each year of the conference, I arranged the words so that the size and color intensity was proportional to word's frequency for that year. I modified WordCram to get word arrangements that were both denser and more uniform that its usual algorithms could produce. The word coloring varied uniformly over a small color range from top to bottom and left to right. Each year had slightly different range, overlapping with the previous year, and drifting from yellow through green in 1980 to the final blue through reddish yellow in 2012. The word arrays seemed endlessly interesting to me. Some words are loaded with context in the security world, and their presence or absence in an array was a source for reflection. As a small example, the word 'alice' appeared briefly in one or two years, but never rose to prominence. These arrays showed that 'system,' 'information,' and 'security' were usually the most frequent words in each year. This wasn't surprising, but I wanted to get more information about the words that had varying popularity, and I wondered if the words could point out trends in topics. That led to the next phase. The second sequence of images used only 50 words. These were the words that were the 'most popular' over the 33 years. For each year, each word had the same placement in the visual array, but the size and color varied. The size of a word was proportional to its frequency for that year. The color hue varied from red to blueish-purple, where red meant the word had not occurred in the previous 5 years, and the amount of blue represented its average frequency during the previous 5 years. As words moved in and out of popularity their size and color and opacity varied to reflect their usage. It was interesting to see how long it took for networking terms like 'message,' 'packet,' and 'node' took to get traction. I was amazed that "privacy" has rarely been a major term, despite it being part of the 'Security and Privacy' symposium's name! And, to me, it was quite significant that 'application' and "attack" have become major terms --- we used to focus on provably secure operating systems, now we try to protect individual applications against specific attacks. I'm a calligrapher and student of typography; the wordcrams are artistic objects that I enjoy, but they carry some fragments of meaning, like pieces of DNA."
-- Richard Power
See Also:
CyLab Research has Powerful Impact on 2010 IEEE Security and Privacy Symposium
Microcosm & Macrocosm: Reflections on 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy; Q and A on Cloud, Cyberwar and Internet Freedom with Dr. Peter Neumann
Five Papers Add to Impressive CyLab Presence at ACM CCS 2011
CyLab Research Presentations Impact CHI 2011
USENIX Security 2011: Another Ring on the Tree Trunk for One of Cyber Security's Worthiest Gatherings, and a Strong CyLab Presence
USENIX Security 2011: CyLab Researchers Release Study on Illicit Online Drug Trade and Attacks on Pharma Industry
A Report on 2012 IEEE Symposium on Privacy and Security
As noted in previous CyBlog posts, IEEE's annual Symposium on Privacy and Security (a.k.a. "Oakland") is an important event in the realm of academic research on how to best strengthen cyber security and privacy. This year's Symposium lived up to expectations. (And I am not just saying that because Carnegie Mellon University CyLab's imprint was on eight different sessions. See CyLab Chronicles: CyLab's Strong Presence at IEEE Security and Privacy 2012 Packs A Wallop.)
Here are a few glimpses into some sessions that interested me.
Prudent Practices for Designing Malware Experiments
Christian Rossow of the Institute for Internet Security delivered a talk on "Prudent Practices for Designing Malware Experiments," a paper co-authored with Christian J. Dietrich and Norbert Pohlmann, also of Institute for Internet Security, along Chris Grier, Christian Kreibich and Vern Paxson of University of California, Berkeley and International Computer Science Institute, Berkeley, as well as Herbert Bos and Maarten van Steen, VU University Amsterdam, The Network Institute.
Rossow articulated numerous guidelines on safety, transparency, realism and correct data sets.
I have pulled out an example of one of the guidelines from each categories:
Safety: "1) Deploy and describe containment policies. Well-designed containment policies facilitate realistic experiments while mitigating the potential harm malware causes to others over time. Experiments should at a minimum employ basic containment policies such as redirecting spam and infection attempts, and identifying and suppressing DoS attacks. Authors should discuss the containment policies and their implications on the fidelity of the experiments. Ideally, authors also monitor and discuss security breaches in their containment."
Transparency: "4) Mention the system used during execution. Malware may execute differently (if at all) across various systems, software configurations and versions. Explicit description of the particular system(s) used (e.g., 'Windows XP SP3 32bit without additional software installations') renders experiments more transparent, especially as presumptions about the 'standard' OS change with time. When relevant, authors should also include version information of installed software.
Realism: "5) Consider allowing Internet access to malware. Deferring legal and ethical considerations for a moment, we argue that experiments become significantly more realistic if the malware has Internet access. Malware often requires connectivity to communicate with command-and-control (C&C) servers and thus to expose its malicious behavior. In exceptional cases where experiments in simulated Internet environments are appropriate, authors need to describe the resulting limitations.
Correct data sets: "2) Balance datasets over malware families. In unbalanced datasets, aggressively polymorphic malware families will often unduly dominate datasets filtered by sample-uniqueness (e.g., MD5 hashes). Authors should discuss if such imbalances biased their experiments, and, if so, balance the datasets to the degree possible. explicitly if they decide to blend malicious traces with benign background activity."
Detecting Hoaxes, Frauds, and Deception in Writing Style Online
Sadia Afroz of Drexel University delivered a talk on "Detecting Hoaxes, Frauds, and Deception in Writing Style Online," a paper co-authored with colleagues Michael Brennan and Rachel Greenstadt.
This fascinating paper used the compelling story from recent headlines, i.e., strange tale of Amina, the "Gay Girl in Damascus," whose blog captured the attention of the world during the early days of the Arab Spring, only to be later revealed as the work of Thomas Macmaster, a 40 year old American male.
In reporting on the research, Afroz and her colleagues, concluded:
"Stylometry is necessary to determine authenticity of a document to prevent deception, hoaxes and frauds. In this work, we show that manual counter-measures against stylometry can be detected using second-order effects. That is, while it may be impossible to detect the author of a document whose authorship has been obfuscated, the obfuscation itself is detectable using a large feature set that is content-independent. Using Information Gain Ratio, we show that the most effective features for detecting deceptive writing are function words. We analyze a long-term deception and show that regular authorship recognition is more effective than deception detection to find indication of stylistic deception in this case."
As Afroz and her colleagues also point out, such research has implications for adversarial learning in general:
"Machine learning is often used in security problems from spam detection, to intrusion detection, to malware analysis. In these situations, the adversarial nature of the problem means that the adversary can often manipulate the classifier to produce lower quality or sometimes entirely ineffective results. In the case of adversarial writing, we show that using a broader feature set causes the manipulation itself to be detectable. This approach may be useful in other areas of adversarial learning to increase accuracy by screening out adversarial inputs."
Oakrams: Searching Through Strands of Oakland's DNA
The three day event culminated in a all-star panel on "How can a Focus on 'Science' Advance Research in Cyber Security?" Moderated by Carl Landwehr, the panel members, including Alessandro Acquisti (Carnegie Mellon), Dan Boneh (Stanford), Joshua Guttman (Worcester Polytechnic Institute), Wenke Lee (Georgia Tech) and Cormac Herley (Microsoft) on whether or not the realm of cyber security as currently constituted should be or is already "science." But honestly, in spite of some sparkling insights, particularly from Acquisti and Herley, this debate has a certain dog chasing its tail futility to it. It is the kind of debate that become central after it is already too late to grasp the reality of a situation. It reminded me of a sage perspective delivered back in the 1990s, by the legendary Donn B. Parker: "Information Security, A Folk Art in Need of An Upgrade." Parker was spot-on on that, as well as on other issues.
So before the theme music to the Bill Murray film Groundhog Day once again starts to rise up in my psyche, let me turn away from the august panel and its erudite dialogue, and end this report from Oakland on a "short talk" in which Hilarie Orman (Purple Streak, Inc.) shared her "Oakrams."
I suggest there is at least as much import in them as in the debate over "cyber security" as "science."
Orman was kind enough to explain her exercise to me.
"I call them 'Oakrams' (the conference used to be called "Oakland" informally, and the software is based on an open source system call 'WordCram.' I modified WordCram so that I could control the coloring based on the word position, and so that I could reuse a word placement while changing size and color. This resulted in two sequences of images. I preprocessed the text of the papers so that for each year I had an ordered list of all non-trivial words that occurred 20 times or more. In the first sequence, for each year of the conference, I arranged the words so that the size and color intensity was proportional to word's frequency for that year. I modified WordCram to get word arrangements that were both denser and more uniform that its usual algorithms could produce. The word coloring varied uniformly over a small color range from top to bottom and left to right. Each year had slightly different range, overlapping with the previous year, and drifting from yellow through green in 1980 to the final blue through reddish yellow in 2012. The word arrays seemed endlessly interesting to me. Some words are loaded with context in the security world, and their presence or absence in an array was a source for reflection. As a small example, the word 'alice' appeared briefly in one or two years, but never rose to prominence. These arrays showed that 'system,' 'information,' and 'security' were usually the most frequent words in each year. This wasn't surprising, but I wanted to get more information about the words that had varying popularity, and I wondered if the words could point out trends in topics. That led to the next phase. The second sequence of images used only 50 words. These were the words that were the 'most popular' over the 33 years. For each year, each word had the same placement in the visual array, but the size and color varied. The size of a word was proportional to its frequency for that year. The color hue varied from red to blueish-purple, where red meant the word had not occurred in the previous 5 years, and the amount of blue represented its average frequency during the previous 5 years. As words moved in and out of popularity their size and color and opacity varied to reflect their usage. It was interesting to see how long it took for networking terms like 'message,' 'packet,' and 'node' took to get traction. I was amazed that "privacy" has rarely been a major term, despite it being part of the 'Security and Privacy' symposium's name! And, to me, it was quite significant that 'application' and "attack" have become major terms --- we used to focus on provably secure operating systems, now we try to protect individual applications against specific attacks. I'm a calligrapher and student of typography; the wordcrams are artistic objects that I enjoy, but they carry some fragments of meaning, like pieces of DNA."
-- Richard Power
See Also:
CyLab Research has Powerful Impact on 2010 IEEE Security and Privacy Symposium
Microcosm & Macrocosm: Reflections on 2010 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy; Q and A on Cloud, Cyberwar and Internet Freedom with Dr. Peter Neumann
Five Papers Add to Impressive CyLab Presence at ACM CCS 2011
CyLab Research Presentations Impact CHI 2011
USENIX Security 2011: Another Ring on the Tree Trunk for One of Cyber Security's Worthiest Gatherings, and a Strong CyLab Presence
USENIX Security 2011: CyLab Researchers Release Study on Illicit Online Drug Trade and Attacks on Pharma Industry
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





